SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Deutsch 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Einloggen
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Über SSOAR
  • Leitlinien
  • Veröffentlichen auf SSOAR
  • Kooperieren mit SSOAR
    • Kooperationsmodelle
    • Ablieferungswege und Formate
    • Projekte
  • Kooperationspartner
    • Informationen zu Kooperationspartnern
  • Informationen
    • Möglichkeiten für den Grünen Weg
    • Vergabe von Nutzungslizenzen
    • Informationsmaterial zum Download
  • Betriebskonzept
Browsen und suchen Dokument hinzufügen OAI-PMH-Schnittstelle
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Volltext herunterladen

(externe Quelle)

Zitationshinweis

Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-4-82-87

Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Bibtex-Export
Endnote-Export

Statistiken anzeigen
Weiterempfehlen
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Принцип равенства перед судом в системном единстве инстанций судебной системы России

The Principle of Equality Before the Court in the Systemic Unity of the Instances of the Judicial System of Russia
[Zeitschriftenartikel]

Mayboroda, Viktor
Shukshin, Sergey I.

Abstract

The article considers the principle of equality of all before the court. Based on the relationship between the possibilities for ensuring procedural equality in the courts of first and appellate instances, the subsequent assessment of the legality of a judicial act in the courts of cassation and at ... mehr

The article considers the principle of equality of all before the court. Based on the relationship between the possibilities for ensuring procedural equality in the courts of first and appellate instances, the subsequent assessment of the legality of a judicial act in the courts of cassation and at the stage of supervisory proceedings, the authors came to the conclusion that the existing means of ensuring equality through economic instruments does not fully correspond to the goals of legal proceedings. In this regard, procedural equality between economically strong subjects, economically self-sufficient subjects and other participants in legal proceedings should be ensured by granting a different scope of procedural rights to persons in a worse economic situation relative to the opposite side.... weniger

Klassifikation
Recht

Freie Schlagwörter
equality of all before the court; procedural rights; forms of judiciary

Sprache Dokument
Russisch

Publikationsjahr
2022

Seitenangabe
S. 82-87

Zeitschriftentitel
Theoretical and Applied Law (2022) 4

ISSN
3034-2813

Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet

Lizenz
Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Impressum  |  Betriebskonzept  |  Datenschutzerklärung
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.