SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(124.7Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-33913

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

FQS debates: standards of Qualitative Social Research

FQS-Debatten: Standards der qualitativen Sozialforschung
[journal article]

Breuer, Franz
Reichertz, Jo

Abstract

Als Moderatoren der FQS(Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung)-Debatte über die Standards der qualitativen Sozialforschung möchten wir den Teilnehmern an dieser Debatte wie den Lesern Umfang und Vielfalt der im wissenschaftsphilosophischen Diskurs involvierten Kriterien ins Gedächtnis rufen. Wir geben E... view more

Als Moderatoren der FQS(Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung)-Debatte über die Standards der qualitativen Sozialforschung möchten wir den Teilnehmern an dieser Debatte wie den Lesern Umfang und Vielfalt der im wissenschaftsphilosophischen Diskurs involvierten Kriterien ins Gedächtnis rufen. Wir geben Eindrücke aus der jüngsten Diskussion wieder, die den Wandel dieser Kriterien betreffen. Wir fordern die Teilnehmer dieser Debatte auf, sich des systematischen und historischen Charakters der postulierten Kriterien bewusst zu sein. (ICEÜbers)... view less


'As moderators of the FQS' debate on the standards of qualitative social research, we remind the participants and the readers of the vastness and the variety of criteria involved in the discourse of philosophy of science. We present impressions on the change of these criteria in recent discussions. ... view more

'As moderators of the FQS' debate on the standards of qualitative social research, we remind the participants and the readers of the vastness and the variety of criteria involved in the discourse of philosophy of science. We present impressions on the change of these criteria in recent discussions. We urge the participants of this debate to become aware of the systematic and historical character of postulated criteria.' (author's abstract)... view less

Keywords
methodology; qualitative method; empirical social research; criterion; validity; scientific character; quality assurance; philosophy of science

Classification
Philosophy of Science, Theory of Science, Methodology, Ethics of the Social Sciences
Research Design

Method
epistemological; basic research

Document language
English

Publication Year
2002

Page/Pages
p. 258-269

Journal
Historical Social Research, 27 (2002) 4

DOI
https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.27.2002.4.258-269

ISSN
0172-6404

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.