Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288280
Exports for your reference manager
A constructive/ist response to Glaser's "Constructivist Grounded Theory?"
[journal article]
Abstract "Recent articles on the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) have started to analyze its conceptual and philosophical foundations. In particular it has been argued that the
early characterizations by GLASER and STRAUSS exhibit a scientistic and positivist orientation that is no longer tenable. In her recent... view more
"Recent articles on the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) have started to analyze its conceptual and philosophical foundations. In particular it has been argued that the
early characterizations by GLASER and STRAUSS exhibit a scientistic and positivist orientation that is no longer tenable. In her recent contribution to the GTM literature,
CHARMAZ distinguished between objectivist GTM and constructivist GTM. This drew a response from Barney GLASER. What follows is a rejoinder to GLASER, offering some clarification of developments in people's understanding of this important and widely-used qualitative approach." (author's abstract)... view less
Keywords
research approach; constructivism; grounded theory; qualitative method
Classification
Research Design
Document language
English
Publication Year
2007
Page/Pages
p. 106-113
Journal
Historical Social Research, Supplement (2007) 19
ISSN
0936-6784
Status
Published Version; peer reviewed